|
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Hardware and Windows Vista Hardware issues in relation to Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 22nd 06, 04:59 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices
|
|||
|
|||
Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions
With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the
native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers useless for my monitor!! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com 
|
|
October 22nd 06, 06:55 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions
/Hugh Jass/ said:
With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers useless for my monitor!! You can use a lower resolution, and still see the correct aspect ratio. I have also noted that their latest driver does not support 1440X900 here, which is the Samsung's 940BW native resolution. I stuck with 96.33.
|
|
October 23rd 06, 08:03 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions
Solved with powerstrip (thanks, Martyn)
-- Jesús Guinda "Hugh Jass" wrote: With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers useless for my monitor!! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
October 23rd 06, 02:11 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions
/jesusg/ said:
"Hugh Jass" wrote: With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers useless for my monitor!! Solved with powerstrip (thanks, Martyn) Appears to be a nice app - for $29.95.
|
|
October 24th 06, 02:07 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions
My 6150LE is running my 19" wide at 1440X900, on the 96.85 driver with no
issue. "Hugh Jass" wrote: With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers useless for my monitor!! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
Linear Mode
