Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Hardware and Windows Vista Hardware issues in relation to Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
So If I want to change my micro to a new faster dual-core version, will I
have to re-load Windows (Vista), etc. or can I just swop the old micro out for the new one and boot up as normal? (The old one is also a dual-core). Both Intel types. Thanks in advance. |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
Upgrading to a different CPU should not make any difference
and you'll be able to boot-up normally. "David" wrote in message ... So If I want to change my micro to a new faster dual-core version, will I have to re-load Windows (Vista), etc. or can I just swop the old micro out for the new one and boot up as normal? (The old one is also a dual-core). Both Intel types. Thanks in advance. |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
im pretty sure you can, i changed my motherboard, ram, CPU and graphics card and diddnt need to reformat however i did just incase it would mean a performance increase and so i could upgrade to vista 64 bit. answer: you dont need to reformat, you should be able to just swap them as long as they both use the same socket (make sure before you buy it). -- DOMINATOR [image: http://www.l33tsig.net/sig/1/DOMINATOR.png] My Rig: -E6550 2.33Ghz Core 2 Duo -P35 DS3 mobo -8800GTS 320MB GFX Card -2GB 800Mhz RAM |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
Thanks, Guys. I have the Intel E6850 ready to plug in.
I also found out that in Vista, you need to force Vista to recognise the new processor in "Device Manager". Check out the Microsoft support info at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930861/en-us "Carey Frisch [MVP]" wrote: Upgrading to a different CPU should not make any difference and you'll be able to boot-up normally. "David" wrote in message ... So If I want to change my micro to a new faster dual-core version, will I have to re-load Windows (Vista), etc. or can I just swop the old micro out for the new one and boot up as normal? (The old one is also a dual-core). Both Intel types. Thanks in advance. |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
I have now installed the new processor and it went okay as far as the
computer goes, i.e. did not have to change anything in Windows. I did have a problem though, my fault. On booting up the first time the processor was only running at 2GHz, (should have been 3GHz), and Windows Vista's performance indicator actually fell below the old processor. Then I noticed the processor temperature was up at 70 deg! Then the computer switched off. Guess what. The processor heat-sink was hanging on by two posts. That stupid system Intel uses to secure the heatsink onto the motherboard which seems to be designed not to work properly unless you press the posts so hard there is danger of breaking the motherboard. Anyway I got it fixed second time around and fortunately the processor turned itself off due to overheating without any damage. So I get a Vista processor performance score of 5.6 with an Intel Core Duo E6850 running at 3GHz with a front side bus running at 1333 MHz and 2GB Corsair 1333MHz RAM on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard and an ASUS EN8800 GTS video card. ALl the other Vista performance indicators (video, etc.), are up at 5.9. (Just in case anyone is interested). Okay. Bye. David. "David" wrote: So If I want to change my micro to a new faster dual-core version, will I have to re-load Windows (Vista), etc. or can I just swop the old micro out for the new one and boot up as normal? (The old one is also a dual-core). Both Intel types. Thanks in advance. |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
Good work David,
"Do it yourself" is great when it all goes as it should. Had your same problem with the stupid Intel system of securing the heatsink onto the motherboard. My fault and I'm now very carefully everytime I assemble a new pc. AndyB "David" ha scritto nel messaggio ... I have now installed the new processor and it went okay as far as the computer goes, i.e. did not have to change anything in Windows. I did have a problem though, my fault. On booting up the first time the processor was only running at 2GHz, (should have been 3GHz), and Windows Vista's performance indicator actually fell below the old processor. Then I noticed the processor temperature was up at 70 deg! Then the computer switched off. Guess what. The processor heat-sink was hanging on by two posts. That stupid system Intel uses to secure the heatsink onto the motherboard which seems to be designed not to work properly unless you press the posts so hard there is danger of breaking the motherboard. Anyway I got it fixed second time around and fortunately the processor turned itself off due to overheating without any damage. So I get a Vista processor performance score of 5.6 with an Intel Core Duo E6850 running at 3GHz with a front side bus running at 1333 MHz and 2GB Corsair 1333MHz RAM on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard and an ASUS EN8800 GTS video card. ALl the other Vista performance indicators (video, etc.), are up at 5.9. (Just in case anyone is interested). Okay. Bye. David. "David" wrote: So If I want to change my micro to a new faster dual-core version, will I have to re-load Windows (Vista), etc. or can I just swop the old micro out for the new one and boot up as normal? (The old one is also a dual-core). Both Intel types. Thanks in advance. |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
yea, a lot of computers can turn themselves off before a part is damaged, thats the only reason i decided to put mine together and i was fine. I accidentally put to power things into my 8800GTS graphics card (it had 2 sockets on the converter thingo so i assumed i needed to put them into 2 power cables) and it shut itself off 3 seconds after i turned it on. No harm done like you it gets a rating of 5.9 for graphics. Processor is an E6550 2.33Ghz, similair to yours (but yours is way better) and gets 5.4. -- DOMINATOR [image: http://www.l33tsig.net/sig/1/DOMINATOR.png] My Rig: -E6550 2.33Ghz Core 2 Duo -P35 DS3 mobo -8800GTS 320MB GFX Card -2GB 800Mhz RAM |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
With my little machine, 6600 2.40 GHz I keep a steady 5.9 on graphics and
it's by far the best and most stable system I've worked with so far. Lot's of home work before going for it and at the end of it all went for an Asus P5W DH DeLuxe motherboard, Dual core 6600 2.40 GHz, 4 Gb Ram and Raid 0 hard disk system. Operating system Vista Business 64 Bit. So far have had less problems then what I thought and for sure less then what I had with Xp years back. Next step want to try Raid 5 disks.. Evening to all AndyB "DOMINATOR" ha scritto nel messaggio news yea, a lot of computers can turn themselves off before a part is damaged, thats the only reason i decided to put mine together and i was fine. I accidentally put to power things into my 8800GTS graphics card (it had 2 sockets on the converter thingo so i assumed i needed to put them into 2 power cables) and it shut itself off 3 seconds after i turned it on. No harm done like you it gets a rating of 5.9 for graphics. Processor is an E6550 2.33Ghz, similair to yours (but yours is way better) and gets 5.4. -- DOMINATOR [image: http://www.l33tsig.net/sig/1/DOMINATOR.png] My Rig: -E6550 2.33Ghz Core 2 Duo -P35 DS3 mobo -8800GTS 320MB GFX Card -2GB 800Mhz RAM |
|
|||
Changing the microprocessor
Actually, funny you mention RAID. I was using RAID-0 on my previous
motherboard for real time data protection and it went well for quite some time and then I started having problems with the HDD's thrashing about and taking ages to boot up, etc. Then I starterd getting error messages about the HDD's. So I start panicking thinking my HDD's are about to pack up. So I download test software from HDD suppliers and find nothing wrong. Then I suspect that the m/board RAID controller is at fault. So I disabled the RAID and no problems after that. Now I am wary of on-board RAID controllers. I think next time a separate RAID card might be the better way to go. Problem now is to find space to put the card in. Bye. David. "BENAGLIA" wrote: With my little machine, 6600 2.40 GHz I keep a steady 5.9 on graphics and it's by far the best and most stable system I've worked with so far. Lot's of home work before going for it and at the end of it all went for an Asus P5W DH DeLuxe motherboard, Dual core 6600 2.40 GHz, 4 Gb Ram and Raid 0 hard disk system. Operating system Vista Business 64 Bit. So far have had less problems then what I thought and for sure less then what I had with Xp years back. Next step want to try Raid 5 disks.. Evening to all AndyB "DOMINATOR" ha scritto nel messaggio news yea, a lot of computers can turn themselves off before a part is damaged, thats the only reason i decided to put mine together and i was fine. I accidentally put to power things into my 8800GTS graphics card (it had 2 sockets on the converter thingo so i assumed i needed to put them into 2 power cables) and it shut itself off 3 seconds after i turned it on. No harm done like you it gets a rating of 5.9 for graphics. Processor is an E6550 2.33Ghz, similair to yours (but yours is way better) and gets 5.4. -- DOMINATOR [image: http://www.l33tsig.net/sig/1/DOMINATOR.png] My Rig: -E6550 2.33Ghz Core 2 Duo -P35 DS3 mobo -8800GTS 320MB GFX Card -2GB 800Mhz RAM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|