![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Lang Murphy wrote:
Hmmm, wouldn't RC2 precede RC1? Not that it matters whatsoever. Just wasting time, I am. Lang No, RC2 would come after RC1 just like it did in Win x64. The commonly accepted method of counting puts the number '1' before the number '2' not before. Or, if you are a student of the current U.S. education system it would be anyone's guess as to how you count! |
|
|||
|
I thought I remembered back in the day of Win95 that the RCx's were
ascending, with RC1 being the final release right before RTM. Sorta like a countdown... 5-4-3-2-1. Ta-da! But... it could just be an addled mind at work. ;-D Lang wrote in message ... Lang Murphy wrote: Hmmm, wouldn't RC2 precede RC1? Not that it matters whatsoever. Just wasting time, I am. Lang No, RC2 would come after RC1 just like it did in Win x64. The commonly accepted method of counting puts the number '1' before the number '2' not before. Or, if you are a student of the current U.S. education system it would be anyone's guess as to how you count! |