![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Installation and Setup of Vista Installation problems and questions using Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi,
Has anyone noticed how many people are having trouble installing RC1??? Wether as an upgrade to previous releases or as a clean installation (I've tried both ways several times now). For the last day I have been trying to install RC1 without success. Having read through the posts on installation and setup there seems to be an awful lot of people having the same problems as myself. All or the majority of who like myself were able to install and run the Beta 2 build with no problems whatsoever. This leads to the question How has the RC1 taken a step backwards from the Beta 2 for so many people? Sure we all use different equipment but all of this equipment was capable of running the previous releases but apparantly not this one. Why, what has changed the only thing to change has been the O/S, which seems like a major step backwards. I'll still try to install it and won't give up until I have installed it as I hate to be beaten -- Ghost |
|
|||
|
Indeed, it looks like there should be a substantial FIX in the pipes
for RC1, very soon...- ![]() "ghost in the machine" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, Has anyone noticed how many people are having trouble installing RC1??? Wether as an upgrade to previous releases or as a clean installation (I've tried both ways several times now). For the last day I have been trying to install RC1 without success. Having read through the posts on installation and setup there seems to be an awful lot of people having the same problems as myself. All or the majority of who like myself were able to install and run the Beta 2 build with no problems whatsoever. This leads to the question How has the RC1 taken a step backwards from the Beta 2 for so many people? Sure we all use different equipment but all of this equipment was capable of running the previous releases but apparantly not this one. Why, what has changed the only thing to change has been the O/S, which seems like a major step backwards. I'll still try to install it and won't give up until I have installed it as I hate to be beaten -- Ghost |
|
|||
|
"Jdr" wrote in message ... Indeed, it looks like there should be a substantial FIX in the pipes for RC1, very soon...- ![]() Microsoft Vista is still a mess More RC1 ramblings WE'VE HAD THE pleasure of using Vista since its very early builds. The first release candidate is now upon us, and was made available to download by TechBeta and Technology Adoption Program program subscribers last week. MSDN and TechNet subscribers should now also be able to grab the near-complete RC1 release, build number 5600. One INQUIRER columnist has already given us his positive and then negative spin on RC1, and further testing from this hack has uncovered further problems. Throughout the testing of the past releases, it was strikingly evident how incomplete Vista's code was. Various incomplete features, missing graphics, place-holder text messages, and a plethora of bugs, left many feeling very underwhelmed, and increasingly worried by the next operating system from Microsoft. A release candidate should consist of all features that will appear in the finished product, in an almost final state, with simple bug fixing and last-minute problem finding being the main concerns of the testers and developers. A beta 2 'pre-RC1' build, numbered 5536, of Vista was only recently made available for download just before RC1, and was considered surprisingly stable and bug-free compared to previous betas. RC1, then, should easily cope under scrutiny from the INQUIRER. Installation The install didn't go well. The test system had a Nvidia based RAID setup over two SATA disks which had been running XP perfectly for some time. Vista refused to see the RAID, even with beta Vista-specific drivers from Nvidia. Booting Vista from within XP allowed setup to see the hard-disks, but after the preliminary setup routines, and a reboot, Vista failed to again see the drives. Searching Nvidia forums gave an answer - load the Vista specific drivers in an XP-based Vista setup even when it recognizes the RAID. The install then worked. Its surprising one of the most utilised RAID supporting motherboardchipsets from one of the biggest suppliers of chipsets are still having problems with their Vista drivers at this very late stage. Previous critical examination of Microsoft's new beloved font types in our Office 2007 articles seems to have fallen on deaf ears - the installation font looked awful, with random spacing occurring between letters much like that in the Office beta's. It looks amateurish at best. More... http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=34268 |
|
|||
|
I actually went backwards after a failed install on MSI K8. Loaded Vista on a NF2 just fine. Have you tried the Vista Upgrade advisor? "ghost in the machine" wrote: Hi, Has anyone noticed how many people are having trouble installing RC1??? Wether as an upgrade to previous releases or as a clean installation (I've tried both ways several times now). For the last day I have been trying to install RC1 without success. Having read through the posts on installation and setup there seems to be an awful lot of people having the same problems as myself. All or the majority of who like myself were able to install and run the Beta 2 build with no problems whatsoever. This leads to the question How has the RC1 taken a step backwards from the Beta 2 for so many people? Sure we all use different equipment but all of this equipment was capable of running the previous releases but apparantly not this one. Why, what has changed the only thing to change has been the O/S, which seems like a major step backwards. I'll still try to install it and won't give up until I have installed it as I hate to be beaten -- Ghost |