![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Windows Vista File Management Issues or questions in relation to Vista's file management. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.file_management) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In XP, I could place nested folders with shortcuts at the start menu. This
results in folder being on the top of the "All Programs" stack and it worked fine. However, if I do that in Vista, it will display along with all the other folders because it seems that Vista doesn't have a stack above "Programs". But I find that a folder placed in the start menu will not open to expose the subfolders and/or shortcuts it contains. I suppose this is by design, but I thought I'd write this post to be sure. Can anyone confirm this is the way Vista is? Or is there another way to do what I want? In particular: IN XP, it is okay to place folders and shortcuts at the following path. Doing so will place them above all others in the "All Programs" menu. C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu IN VISTA, only shortcuts may be placed in the following path. Placing folders here will not work. C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu The only solution I've found is to go one deeper at: C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs Any thoughts? Thanks! --- Bob |
|
|||
|
Hello Bob,
Thank you for using newsgroup! Based on my test, I can reproduce this scenario which I think this is by design. Thanks & Regards, Ken Zhao Microsoft Online Support Microsoft Global Technical Support Center Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security http://www.microsoft.com/security ================================================== == When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. ================================================== == This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. |
|
|||
|
"Bob" wrote:
[snip] In particular: IN XP, it is okay to place folders and shortcuts at the following path. Doing so will place them above all others in the "All Programs" menu. C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu IN VISTA, only shortcuts may be placed in the following path. Placing folders here will not work. C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu The only solution I've found is to go one deeper at: C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs Any thoughts? I've put several folders in the Start Menu folder, at the same level as the Programs folder. They appear at the very top of the first window that appears when I click "start". I didn't do anything special to get them there, other than respond to a bunch of annoying elevation and permission prompts. Could it depend on the version of Vista? I'm running home premium. Are you using an administrator account? That might make a difference. To put folders in the Start Menu folder, I right-click the start button and select "explore all users". Then I just copy/paste them where I want them. Vista asks for permission for each move, of course. -- Ray (remove the Xs to reply) |
|
|||
|
What you are trying to do will work, just like it does in XP, if you choose
the Classic start menu in Vista. Personally I prefer the classic menu, but if you want the added bells and whistles of the new Vista start menu, you can only rearrange your folders under \Start Menu\Programs\ Also I find it annoying how the menus from subfolders of Programs do not spring out automatically when you hover on them. You have to click them. The classic start menu does keep that cascading submenus feature. |
|
|||
|
Yes, that is what I'm experiencing too.
I also miss the cascading submenus feature from XP (AND btw the inability to collapse unaffected folders in IE 7 when you try to add favorites!) There must be a whole new generation of programmers to MSFT that don't appreciate the old XP/IE6 folder presentation techniques. I'll keep the good, bad and ugly look of Vista for my user community as I want them to see Vista as most of the world will see it. They are free to change to the classic look if they can figure out how. Thanks for the confirmation. Bob. |
|
|||
|
=?Utf-8?B?QWx0emhlaW1lcg==?=
wrote: What you are trying to do will work, just like it does in XP, if you choose the Classic start menu in Vista. Personally I prefer the classic menu, but if you want the added bells and whistles of the new Vista start menu, you can only rearrange your folders under \Start Menu\Programs\ I had forgotten about the non-classic view, since I changed to the classic view immediately on starting Vista for the first time. If you use the classic view to put folders under Start Menu, what happens to them if you then change to non-classic view? -- Ray (remove the Xs to reply) |
|
|||
|
Windows Vista Home Premium
I can't the Menu re-organization to work properly with the default Menu. Changed it to the Classic view, re-organized, works great... except when you go back to the default view... the changes are there but they don't work... Gary "Ray" wrote: =?Utf-8?B?QWx0emhlaW1lcg==?= wrote: What you are trying to do will work, just like it does in XP, if you choose the Classic start menu in Vista. Personally I prefer the classic menu, but if you want the added bells and whistles of the new Vista start menu, you can only rearrange your folders under \Start Menu\Programs\ I had forgotten about the non-classic view, since I changed to the classic view immediately on starting Vista for the first time. If you use the classic view to put folders under Start Menu, what happens to them if you then change to non-classic view? -- Ray (remove the Xs to reply) |