![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have a small cabled network with three XP machines and one Vista Home Premium
laptop. Internet is no problem. The XP machines have no problem seeing Vista's shared files. But the Vista laptop somtimes takes ages before it sees the XP machines, sometimes it is almost immediate. That bugs me: there is no consistency. With exactly the same settings Vista will sometimes take up to half an hour (!) to see the XP machines and sometimes "only" minutes (once Vista sees the XP boxes, it can drag files and things over normally). Any ideas how to remedy this? -- Groet, Adriana [ gooi de vuilnis weg als je me wilt mailen ] www.spinsister.nl |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:44:06 +0100, A.Translator
wrote: I have a small cabled network with three XP machines and one Vista Home Premium laptop. Internet is no problem. The XP machines have no problem seeing Vista's shared files. But the Vista laptop somtimes takes ages before it sees the XP machines, sometimes it is almost immediate. That bugs me: there is no consistency. With exactly the same settings Vista will sometimes take up to half an hour (!) to see the XP machines and sometimes "only" minutes (once Vista sees the XP boxes, it can drag files and things over normally). Any ideas how to remedy this? Adriana, What exactly are you doing when you measure this mysterious time before one computer "sees" the other? What do you do to change things, after that time, until the next time? Are you turning computers off (which computers?), are you rebooting computers (which computers?), do you log off computers (which computers?)? Where does the Vista computer "see" the XP computer? The Network window, or the Network Map? These are 2 different things. There are a number of issues which computers running Windows Vista can introduce into a network. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/12/windows-xp-and-vista-on-lan-together.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/1...-together.html The RWin Auto Tuning problem seems to affect local connections. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2007/06/autotuning-in-vista-maybe-not-ready-for.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2007/0...ready-for.html And look at your protocol stack. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/fix-network-problems-but-clean-up.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...-clean-up.html Finally, look at the network setup as a whole. Compare logs from "browstat status", "ipconfig /all", "net config server", and "net config workstation", from each computer. Read this article, and linked articles, and follow instructions precisely (download browstat!) (note how to use the command window in Vista): http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/troubleshooting-network-neighborhood.html#AskingForHelp http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...#AskingForHelp -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
Wow, that is a ton of information, lots of it way above my head, but I will
look into it. Thank you. As I said, though: once it works, it works without a glitch, so I must be doing something right. What exactly are you doing when you measure this mysterious time before one computer "sees" the other? I am not a native English speaker, but thought that computers in networks saw each other, ie recognised each other's existence and allowing each other to transport files back and forth. Any way, that is what I mean by "seeing". What do you do to change things, after that time, until the next time? Are you turning computers off (which computers?), are ryou ebooting computers (which computers?), do you log off computers (which computers?)? Once the network works, there is no time lap. The minutes-long wait occurs after switching off the Vista machine. When restarting that one, the network is sometimes accesible after several seconds or minutes, sometimes indeed only after half an hour. I have been trying to find out if things get sped up by my actively using the Vista machine, in stead of just staring at it. So far I haven't noticed any difference (but I have no professional bench mark instruments) with lots or less activity. I can't keep on looking at the Network window (or folder, I mean the one that pops up after clicking "network" in de Menu Start) so I do turn my attention to other things on the Vista. Internet, Word, that sort of thing. And then, sometimes, when I go back to Network, lo and behold the other computers are there. But sometimes they are still invisible. I am in the process of transporting files and settings from my Windows Desktop to my Vista Laptop, so I do get to look in Network quite often. -- Groet, Adriana [ gooi de vuilnis weg als je me wilt mailen ] www.spinsister.nl |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:09:44 +0100, A.Translator
wrote: Wow, that is a ton of information, lots of it way above my head, but I will look into it. Thank you. As I said, though: once it works, it works without a glitch, so I must be doing something right. What exactly are you doing when you measure this mysterious time before one computer "sees" the other? I am not a native English speaker, but thought that computers in networks saw each other, ie recognised each other's existence and allowing each other to transport files back and forth. Any way, that is what I mean by "seeing". What do you do to change things, after that time, until the next time? Are you turning computers off (which computers?), are ryou ebooting computers (which computers?), do you log off computers (which computers?)? Once the network works, there is no time lap. The minutes-long wait occurs after switching off the Vista machine. When restarting that one, the network is sometimes accesible after several seconds or minutes, sometimes indeed only after half an hour. I have been trying to find out if things get sped up by my actively using the Vista machine, in stead of just staring at it. So far I haven't noticed any difference (but I have no professional bench mark instruments) with lots or less activity. I can't keep on looking at the Network window (or folder, I mean the one that pops up after clicking "network" in de Menu Start) so I do turn my attention to other things on the Vista. Internet, Word, that sort of thing. And then, sometimes, when I go back to Network, lo and behold the other computers are there. But sometimes they are still invisible. I am in the process of transporting files and settings from my Windows Desktop to my Vista Laptop, so I do get to look in Network quite often. Read it as best you can, and ask questions. Writing about it from scratch is not something I try to do frequently. Most of it I wrote to explain the details to myself, so I sympathise with you when you say "way above my head", because it feels that way to me too sometimes. There are an almost infinite amount of details, that make YOUR network work the way YOU want it to (when you get them right of course). There's no magical, built-in ability of "computers in networks to see each other". What YOU observe in My Network Places ("Network" in Vista) is the output of a painfully complex subsystem known as the NT Browser (please don't confuse this with Internet Explorer etc). The browser is a peer-peer resource enumeration facility. I think this article is a bit lighter on technical detail. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...lways-see.html I really like the RWin Auto Tuning issue right now, as one factor in your problem. If that's not a possible improvement, then run the logs I suggest and we'll peruse them. But give the article above a read too, as it is the core of your symptoms. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
Chuck [MVP] schreef op 12-11-2007
I really like the RWin Auto Tuning issue right now, as one factor in your problem. If that's not a possible improvement I will try the logs once I got my nerve back: just went into the command prompt in Vista and typed: netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=disabled {enter} (it was never the Internet that wasn't accessible, just my local network) then restarted and tried again: no improvements in network speed. By then I was sweating heavily and feeling very nervous so I thought I'd turn this autotuning back on by typing in the command window: netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=enabled {enter} On which Windows responed: cannot execute command, incorrect parameter. (or words to that effect; my Windows speaks Dutch). So how do I get things back to where they were? I think I'd rather put up with the long wait before I can get files from other computers in the network than go trough this nerve wracking experience again. Hey, wait! Just restarted the Vista laptop again, after (unsuccesfully) trying to re-enable autotuning, and the whole network is instantly visible and accesible! Was the autotuning the cause after all? Do I have to go and look for a new modem/router now? Just tried again and restarted the Vista laptop: back to the old situation, network not yet visible. Does the command only work the once? One 'session'? Is that why I couldn't / shouldn't try to turn autotuning back on? Thanks a lot for your patience and information. -- Groet, Adriana [ gooi de vuilnis weg als je me wilt mailen ] www.spinsister.nl |
|
|||
|
A.Translator schreef op 12-11-2007
netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=enabled {enter} Should this have been netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=normal? -- Groet, Adriana [ gooi de vuilnis weg als je me wilt mailen ] www.spinsister.nl |
|
|||
|
netsh int tcp set global autotuninglevel=enabled
--- Jeffrey Randow Windows Networking MVP 2001-2006 http://www.networkblog.net On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:54:24 +0100, A.Translator wrote: A.Translator schreef op 12-11-2007 netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=enabled {enter} Should this have been netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=normal? |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:45:57 -0600, Jeffrey Randow
wrote: netsh int tcp set global autotuninglevel=enabled I don't think anybody knows what Microsoft did with this one. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934430 Manually determine whether Windows Scaling is being handled incorrectly by the firewall device. To do this, follow these steps: 1. Click Start button, click All Programs, click Accessories, and then click Command Prompt. 2. At the command prompt, type the following command, and then press ENTER: netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled This command disables the Receive Window Auto-Tuning feature. 3. Try to make a non-HTTP network connection. Note If the connectivity problem is resolved, contact the manufacturer of the firewall device for steps to correct the issue. 4. At a command prompt, type the following command, and then press ENTER: netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=normal This command enables Receive Window Auto-Tuning again so that you can take advantage of the increase in network throughput performance that this option provides -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:54:24 +0100, A.Translator
wrote: A.Translator schreef op 12-11-2007 netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=enabled {enter} Should this have been netsh interface tcp set global autotuning=normal? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934430 Manually determine whether Windows Scaling is being handled incorrectly by the firewall device. To do this, follow these steps: 1. Click Start button, click All Programs, click Accessories, and then click Command Prompt. 2. At the command prompt, type the following command, and then press ENTER: netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled This command disables the Receive Window Auto-Tuning feature. 3. Try to make a non-HTTP network connection. Note If the connectivity problem is resolved, contact the manufacturer of the firewall device for steps to correct the issue. 4. At a command prompt, type the following command, and then press ENTER: netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=normal This command enables Receive Window Auto-Tuning again so that you can take advantage of the increase in network throughput performance that this option provides -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
Chuck [MVP] schreef op 13-11-2007
At the command prompt, type the following command, and then press ENTER: netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled This command disables the Receive Window Auto-Tuning feature. 3. Try to make a non-HTTP network connection. Note If the connectivity problem is resolved, contact the manufacturer of the firewall device for steps to correct the issue. 4. At a command prompt, type the following command, and then press ENTER: netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=normal This command enables Receive Window Auto-Tuning again so that you can take advantage of the increase in network throughput performance that this option provides I did all that, and performance seems improved (i.e. the XP-machines show up within seconds/minutes on the Vista-machine now - nothing like the half hour I had to wait before), but in fact nothing has changed, since I put auto-tuning back to normal. Baffling, but I am happy and grateful for your help. -- Groet, Adriana [ gooi de vuilnis weg als je me wilt mailen ] www.spinsister.nl |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|