![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Two Vista PC's are connected in a network. The first PC has 2 network
interfaces, one of which is connected to the internet. The internet connection is shared with a second PC, connected via a crossover ethernet cable. Internet --- PC1 -- crossover cable -- PC2 The 2nd PC can browse the internet, it can ping the first PC (192.168.0.1) and it can access shares on the first PC. But the 1st PC can't ping the second PC! It can't access shares on that PC either, and when I tracert to the 2nd PC, it shows "tracing route to PC2.mshome.net". Note the weird mshome.net postfix. Both PC's are in a workgroup which is not called mshome.net. Anyone has a clue why the 2nd PC can ping the 1st PC, but not the other way round? |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:44:48 -0800 (PST), Wessel Troost
wrote: Two Vista PC's are connected in a network. The first PC has 2 network interfaces, one of which is connected to the internet. The internet connection is shared with a second PC, connected via a crossover ethernet cable. Internet --- PC1 -- crossover cable -- PC2 The 2nd PC can browse the internet, it can ping the first PC (192.168.0.1) and it can access shares on the first PC. But the 1st PC can't ping the second PC! It can't access shares on that PC either, and when I tracert to the 2nd PC, it shows "tracing route to PC2.mshome.net". Note the weird mshome.net postfix. Both PC's are in a workgroup which is not called mshome.net. Anyone has a clue why the 2nd PC can ping the 1st PC, but not the other way round? Wessel, Asymmetrical access, or pinging, is generally a personal firewall problem. What personal firewall does each use? http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/your-personal-firewall-can-either-help.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...ther-help.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/12/windows-xp-and-vista-on-lan-together.html#Security http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/1....html#Security When you say "can't ping", what exact error message are you getting, or problem are you seeing? http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/background-information-useful-in.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...useful-in.html You could look at logs from "browstat status" and "ipconfig /all", from each computer, and diagnose the problem. Read this article, and linked articles, and follow instructions precisely (download browstat!) (note use of the command window in Vista): http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/troubleshooting-network-neighborhood.html#AskingForHelp http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...#AskingForHelp -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
Asymmetrical access, or pinging, is generally a personal firewall problem. What
personal firewall does each use? Both PC's use Windows Firewall only, with NOD32 as the virus scanner. Disabling either Windows Firewall or NOD32 virus scanner does not make a difference. When you say "can't ping", what exact error message are you getting, or problem are you seeing? It gives a timeout. A traceroute gives a timeout too (* * *). You could look at logs from "browstat status" and "ipconfig /all", from each computer, and diagnose the problem. Read this article, and linked articles, and follow instructions precisely (download browstat!) (note use of the command window in Vista): Ping is still a network layer below the SMB protocol, so I assume if you can't ping, then checking the browser is a step too far. Ipconfig shows what you'd expect it to: 192.168.0.1 for the LAN interface, and a private IP handed out by the DHCP server in the DSL modem for the internet connection. As an additional problem Vista kept doing discovery on the network interface connected to the internet, even though I disabled all protocols except IP4 on that adapter. The network neighbourhood would display the ADSL modem but not the other PC. (I've checked the cables by disconnecting them, and the adapter I think is Internet becomes disabled when I unplug the internet cable.) The ADSL modem got confused by the Vista discovery, resolving DNS queries to the wrong address. A reboot of the ADSL modem would restore Internet connectivity. Removing Internet connectivity altogether does not allow PC1 to ping PC2. After each reboot, PC1 insists that the twisted ethernet cable connection is a "public network", even tho I change it to private every time. Reverting PC1 to Windows XP resolves the problem. Windows XP can ping PC2, it can access shares on PC2, and it does not confuse the ADSL modem. Is it worth trying to get Vista to work, or is not capable to perform the router job XP did with the lovely "Share Internet Conenction" switch? |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:07:08 -0800 (PST), Wessel Troost
wrote: Asymmetrical access, or pinging, is generally a personal firewall problem. What personal firewall does each use? Both PC's use Windows Firewall only, with NOD32 as the virus scanner. Disabling either Windows Firewall or NOD32 virus scanner does not make a difference. When you say "can't ping", what exact error message are you getting, or problem are you seeing? It gives a timeout. A traceroute gives a timeout too (* * *). You could look at logs from "browstat status" and "ipconfig /all", from each computer, and diagnose the problem. Read this article, and linked articles, and follow instructions precisely (download browstat!) (note use of the command window in Vista): Ping is still a network layer below the SMB protocol, so I assume if you can't ping, then checking the browser is a step too far. Ipconfig shows what you'd expect it to: 192.168.0.1 for the LAN interface, and a private IP handed out by the DHCP server in the DSL modem for the internet connection. As an additional problem Vista kept doing discovery on the network interface connected to the internet, even though I disabled all protocols except IP4 on that adapter. The network neighbourhood would display the ADSL modem but not the other PC. (I've checked the cables by disconnecting them, and the adapter I think is Internet becomes disabled when I unplug the internet cable.) The ADSL modem got confused by the Vista discovery, resolving DNS queries to the wrong address. A reboot of the ADSL modem would restore Internet connectivity. Removing Internet connectivity altogether does not allow PC1 to ping PC2. After each reboot, PC1 insists that the twisted ethernet cable connection is a "public network", even tho I change it to private every time. Reverting PC1 to Windows XP resolves the problem. Windows XP can ping PC2, it can access shares on PC2, and it does not confuse the ADSL modem. Is it worth trying to get Vista to work, or is not capable to perform the router job XP did with the lovely "Share Internet Conenction" switch? Here are the known causes of "cannot ping" (dropped packets, not name resolution problem): 1) Hardware - defective cabling, router, network card. 2) IP setting - wrong subnet or IP address. 3) Firewall - misconfigured or overlooked firewall can block ping packets. 4) LSP / Winsock - corrupt LSP / Winsock stack can misdirect ping packets. #1 is always a possibility - either cabling, network card, or router can cause asymmetrical traffic. #2 should be symmetrical, so that's out. #3 is generally a problem with pings at the network level. Windows Firewall should be disablable, with no penalty. NOD32 possibly contains an antiworm component that will block SMBs (browser etc), but shouldn't have any effect on pings. #4 is a possibility under Vista. LSP / Winsock is still part of the network stack. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...-layer-in.html Now, your symptom of "PC1 insists that the twisted ethernet cable connection is a "public network"" could possibly be a known problem, and could cause confusion in Windows Firewall. Which "twisted Ethernet cable" are we discussing here? http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2007/09/changes-in-internet-explorer-security.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2007/0...-security.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
http://www.lytebyte.com/2007/02/21/h...r-using-vista/
The above should set you on the right path! "Wessel Troost" wrote: Two Vista PC's are connected in a network. The first PC has 2 network interfaces, one of which is connected to the internet. The internet connection is shared with a second PC, connected via a crossover ethernet cable. Internet --- PC1 -- crossover cable -- PC2 The 2nd PC can browse the internet, it can ping the first PC (192.168.0.1) and it can access shares on the first PC. But the 1st PC can't ping the second PC! It can't access shares on that PC either, and when I tracert to the 2nd PC, it shows "tracing route to PC2.mshome.net". Note the weird mshome.net postfix. Both PC's are in a workgroup which is not called mshome.net. Anyone has a clue why the 2nd PC can ping the 1st PC, but not the other way round? |
|
|||
|
First of all thanks for your answer. I was kinda upset about not being
able to get a simple network right and your list of causes gives me something to work on. #1 is always a possibility - either cabling, network card, or router can cause asymmetrical traffic. I'll swap the NIC when I'm back. #4 is a possibility under Vista. LSP / Winsock is still part of the network stack. What would fix this? A reinstall of Vista? Now, your symptom of "PC1 insists that the twisted ethernet cable connection is a "public network"" could possibly be a known problem, and could cause confusion in Windows Firewall. Which "twisted Ethernet cable" are we discussing here? It's the kind of twisted wire that connects two ethernet cards without a hub or router in between. Are there known issues with tiwsted ethernet cables? |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:03:45 -0800 (PST), Wessel Troost
wrote: First of all thanks for your answer. I was kinda upset about not being able to get a simple network right and your list of causes gives me something to work on. #1 is always a possibility - either cabling, network card, or router can cause asymmetrical traffic. I'll swap the NIC when I'm back. #4 is a possibility under Vista. LSP / Winsock is still part of the network stack. What would fix this? A reinstall of Vista? Now, your symptom of "PC1 insists that the twisted ethernet cable connection is a "public network"" could possibly be a known problem, and could cause confusion in Windows Firewall. Which "twisted Ethernet cable" are we discussing here? It's the kind of twisted wire that connects two ethernet cards without a hub or router in between. Are there known issues with tiwsted ethernet cables? There were a number of tools to repair LSP / Winsock, under Windows XP and previous. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...-layer-in.html Having read that article, I believe that only Steps 7b, and 9 - 11, will be applicable. It's possible that the "netsh" command in Windows Vista, will be more effective than it was in Windows XP. I'm researching LSP / Winsock under Windows Vista this week. In terms of the Ethernet cable, you're mentioning a CROSS-OVER cable. If you have connectivity from one computer to another, simply not both ways, your cross-over cable is probably working fine. Here's my instruction for using a cross-over cable. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/07/connecting-two-computers-with.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...ters-with.html And don't be upset with yourself for being upset. Networking isn't simple - even 2 computers offer numerous opportunities for making mistakes. If you want to get a feel for how complex it can be, read my tutorial. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/troubleshooting-network-neighborhood.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...ghborhood.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
The problem has been resolved now-- I'll post the solution in case
anyone encounters a similiar problem. The solution was to uninstall the NOD32 virus scanner. After that, everything worked fine. |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 11:22:08 -0800 (PST), Wessel Troost
wrote: The problem has been resolved now-- I'll post the solution in case anyone encounters a similiar problem. The solution was to uninstall the NOD32 virus scanner. After that, everything worked fine. If you read the networking forums, you'll find that the single most common cause of the problems is problems with personal firewalls or virus protection. Good job. Thanks for letting us know. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |