![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have two laptops, both offers shares. On one, say, "A" I defined a few
folders of "B" to be available offline. Now I need to resynch those, but A claims, it is currently "not connected" to B. In the reverse direction, however, B currently DOES see A and I can e.g. access A's shares. So, obviously, connectivity is there and works. So, why don't things work in the reverse direction? How do I trigger A to retry connect to B? Michael |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:02:07 +0100, "Michael Moser"
wrote: I have two laptops, both offers shares. On one, say, "A" I defined a few folders of "B" to be available offline. Now I need to resynch those, but A claims, it is currently "not connected" to B. In the reverse direction, however, B currently DOES see A and I can e.g. access A's shares. So, obviously, connectivity is there and works. So, why don't things work in the reverse direction? How do I trigger A to retry connect to B? Michael Michael, When you discuss asymmetrical visibility, you're most frequently looking at a personal firewall problem, or maybe a NetBT setting mismatch. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/07/advanced-windows-networking-using.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/0...ing-using.html With Windows Vista, there are a few special possible network problems. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/12/windows-xp-and-vista-on-lan-together.html http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/1...-together.html You can probably analyse the problem, using logs from "browstat status", "ipconfig /all", "net config server", and "net config workstation", from each computer. Read this article, and linked articles, and follow instructions precisely (Download browstat, and note running the command window as admin): http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/troubleshooting-network-neighborhood.html#AskingForHelp http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...#AskingForHelp -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP 2005-2007 [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
|||
|
I read to (some, not all) of the material provided and tried misc.
things suggested (like e.g. installing the LLTP stuff on the XP system) but noting worked.It is also not a firewall issue. Even diabling the firewall completely didn't help... In the end I did the good ol' "net use * /d" to delete all cached credentials after which I was asked again for UID und PWD when trying to access the share and when I re-entered my credentials (for the at least 50th time) things were up and running again. This is getting on my nerves! Why do these crappy OSses not manage to keep this up and working? Why do I have to fiddle with these settings again and again and again??? :-( Apparently things get somehow lost or corrupted or Vista picks wrong credentials or whatever is going off-rails here. What I find most annoying is that this beast doesn't even ask me again for my credentials if things fail, but simply lies to me and declares the other machine as not available... Michael |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|