Determining the presence of wireshark
Rick Jones wrote in news:hn66ht$h7r$2
@usenet01.boi.hp.com:
In comp.os.linux.networking Bob wrote:
Have you tried SNAT? I noticed it on YouTube last week.
http://www.snat-project.com/documentation.html
I'm not sure how robust this:
This action is the one I really like. With the help of it you can
check if a host on your network is running a sniffer (well,
SNIP
host I want to check is 192.168.1.8 As usual go to the directory
where you have snat.jar and execute the command (if you have any
problems go here) :
will be. First, I suppose that 99 times out of 10 a host responding
to that MAC address will be in promiscuous mode, but since the group
bit is set... And I would think all it takes is a small change to the
ARP code to verify that the destination MAC was a full broadcast...
Is this supposedly for Windows, Linux, OSX, BSD, etc ?
I'm sure it's OS specific. For instance, a Windows box will not reply to a
broadcast ping, but a Linux box will.
|