View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old March 9th 10, 07:45 PM posted to alt.internet.wireless,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,microsoft.public.access.security,microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
DanS[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 410
Default Determining the presence of wireshark

Rick Jones wrote in news:hn66ht$h7r$2
@usenet01.boi.hp.com:

In comp.os.linux.networking Bob wrote:
Have you tried SNAT? I noticed it on YouTube last week.
http://www.snat-project.com/documentation.html


I'm not sure how robust this:

This action is the one I really like. With the help of it you can
check if a host on your network is running a sniffer (well,


SNIP

host I want to check is 192.168.1.8 As usual go to the directory
where you have snat.jar and execute the command (if you have any
problems go here) :

will be. First, I suppose that 99 times out of 10 a host responding
to that MAC address will be in promiscuous mode, but since the group
bit is set... And I would think all it takes is a small change to the
ARP code to verify that the destination MAC was a full broadcast...


Is this supposedly for Windows, Linux, OSX, BSD, etc ?

I'm sure it's OS specific. For instance, a Windows box will not reply to a
broadcast ping, but a Linux box will.