![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi everyone,
I have a strange problem with Vista Ultimate 32bit - my LAN connection is showing as 'Unauthenticated' with a yellow warning triangle, and network resources are intermittently unavailable. I'm running a domain, with a Windows 2003 R2 DC. The Vista PC is on an NVidia 680i nForce board, with one gigabit connection active, and the other connection disable in the BIOS. Connecting to a Linksys GigE switch. I was using a VPN to connect to another site, and noticed some local resources becoming unavailable (OneNote went offline, Outlook came up with an error about a pst file that was open on a network drive etc). When I disconnected from the VPN and checked, my LAN connection was showing as (mydomain).local 2 (Unauthenticated) -note the 2, it was a second copy of the LAN connection. I used the Merge and Manage connections to delete the second copy of the connection, and when I reboot I still have the (mydomain).local (Unauthenticated) symbol showing. I can find nothing about this on the web, and I'm puzzled. How can I restore this to normal, and what happened? Please help! Regards, Colm |
|
|||
|
Found this in my event viewer also-Simply cannot tell if it is relevant,
there is nothing online about it, and if you check it online, there is no extra info from MS Log Name: System Source: Tcpip Event ID: 4227 Level: Warning TCP/IP failed to establish an outgoing connection because the selected local endpoint was recently used to connect to the same remote endpoint. This error typically occurs when outgoing connections are opened and closed at a high rate, causing all available local ports to be used and forcing TCP/IP to reuse a local port for an outgoing connection. To minimize the risk of data corruption, the TCP/IP standard requires a minimum time period to elapse between successive connections from a given local endpoint to a given remote endpoint. Not sure if this sheds any light! Regards, Colm |
|
|||
|
Disable and then enable NIC. Check the following post for more details. If
that doesn't fix the problem, re-install the NIC. Please post back with the result. Event ID 4227 TCP/IP failed to establish an outgoing connect http://www.chicagotech.net/netforums...hp?p=4157#4157 -- Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com "Colm" wrote in message ... Found this in my event viewer also-Simply cannot tell if it is relevant, there is nothing online about it, and if you check it online, there is no extra info from MS Log Name: System Source: Tcpip Event ID: 4227 Level: Warning TCP/IP failed to establish an outgoing connection because the selected local endpoint was recently used to connect to the same remote endpoint. This error typically occurs when outgoing connections are opened and closed at a high rate, causing all available local ports to be used and forcing TCP/IP to reuse a local port for an outgoing connection. To minimize the risk of data corruption, the TCP/IP standard requires a minimum time period to elapse between successive connections from a given local endpoint to a given remote endpoint. Not sure if this sheds any light! Regards, Colm |
|
|||
|
I had already tried disabling and re-enabling the NIC many (10) times, and
also trying diagnose and repair with no luck. Had not yet tried reinstalling NIC as the nForce NIC drivers seem to have some issues, and the last few times I've installed the latest nVidia drivers I've had a non-functioning NIC, and hard-reboots on trying to uninstall or roll-back the driver. Now using the original MS Vista driver. I had already tried rebooting, again, something like 10 times- I had temporarily given up on fixing this as I had some work to do, and a little while ago, an unrelated reboot cured this! This is very disturbing as, other than using a VPN connection, which I do regularly, there were no configuration changes made to the machine, and it both broke and fixed itself with no explanation. I'm concerned that this may happen again. Thoughts? "Robert L. (MS-MVP)" wrote in message ... Disable and then enable NIC. Check the following post for more details. If that doesn't fix the problem, re-install the NIC. Please post back with the result. Event ID 4227 TCP/IP failed to establish an outgoing connect http://www.chicagotech.net/netforums...hp?p=4157#4157 -- Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com "Colm" wrote in message ... Found this in my event viewer also-Simply cannot tell if it is relevant, there is nothing online about it, and if you check it online, there is no extra info from MS Log Name: System Source: Tcpip Event ID: 4227 Level: Warning TCP/IP failed to establish an outgoing connection because the selected local endpoint was recently used to connect to the same remote endpoint. This error typically occurs when outgoing connections are opened and closed at a high rate, causing all available local ports to be used and forcing TCP/IP to reuse a local port for an outgoing connection. To minimize the risk of data corruption, the TCP/IP standard requires a minimum time period to elapse between successive connections from a given local endpoint to a given remote endpoint. Not sure if this sheds any light! Regards, Colm |