Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Security and Windows Vista A forum for discussion on security issues with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.security) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
On Explorer's toolbarinthe folderis therea button "Compatability Files"? -- .. -- "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
It has to do with Vista's shadow copy. -- lemur ::If *ANYONE* in this forum helps you, please click on their *REP* icon. Thanks! (the middle scale icon in the upper right corner):: |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
It has to do with Vista's shadow copy. -- lemur ::If *ANYONE* in this forum helps you, please click on their *REP* icon. Thanks! (the middle scale icon in the upper right corner):: |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE
files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
No it doesn't. It has to come with windows to be protected. Your symptoms
are to do with compatibility files. -- .. -- "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
No it doesn't. It has to come with windows to be protected. Your symptoms
are to do with compatibility files. -- .. -- "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
Check to see if your "new code" is being saved into a virtualized
"Program Files" within the user's profile. See this also, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927387 "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
Check to see if your "new code" is being saved into a virtualized "Program Files" within the user's profile. See this also, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927387 "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |
|
|||
Vista 64bit rpeventing file copy
This looks really promising. I will test this one out.
Thanks Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Check to see if your "new code" is being saved into a virtualized "Program Files" within the user's profile. See this also, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927387 "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... This seems the most promising direction. I did some quick looking up and MDE files are one that is protected. I don't understand why Windows would consider my app a protected file but it seems to fit the pattern. The solution according to what I found it to create my updates as bona fide installers and not just a simple file-copy. I will test this out. Thanks for the help. Tony "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... Read up on Windows Resource Protection (WRP) to determine if your file is being "protected". Userland users may experience silent protection whereas as an administrator they might get an error message (--clue). "Tony Vrolyk" wrote in message ... I sell a program that I wrote in Access and have had a couple customers with 64 bit versions of Windows Vista where if I send them an updated file, via email or download, it appears as though the file has copied over the old version but when they run the program it is still the old version of the program. Is there some underlying copy protection that is preventing me from copying over the file yet does not report any error or security warning? Here are a couple details * The original install program installs the Access runtime, my program and related system files. The program itself is made up of two files. one Access MDE (like a read-only Access file that contains all the coding) and a database file. * I then sent them an update which consists of a zip file that contains a new MDE. They are to copy that over their existing MDE in order to use the new version. * In one instance I was able to remote into the customer's PC and do the file copy it myself. I can see the file copy, the file size and date appear to be correct for the new version but when I would run it it would run the old code. Ths PC was an HP laptop if that makes any difference This is driving me batty. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks Tony |