Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
If you want a little background on the design decisions made for Vista's
defrag, see our blog at https://blogs.technet.com/filecab/ar...r/default.aspx. You might find the FAQ useful, as well as the recent chat transcript. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx. "James" wrote in message ... Hello people, any one know the reason why microsoft had dumbed down DEFRAG ?? |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
Sorry Jill,
Lotsa people don't like that decision though, Sorry bout the comment. Jeff "Jill Zoeller [MSFT]" wrote in message ... If you want a little background on the design decisions made for Vista's defrag, see our blog at https://blogs.technet.com/filecab/ar...r/default.aspx. You might find the FAQ useful, as well as the recent chat transcript. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx. "James" wrote in message ... Hello people, any one know the reason why microsoft had dumbed down DEFRAG ?? |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
No worries--it's not the first time it's come up! A given design won't
always make 100% of users happy, and there are alternatives out there for folks who like a full-featured graphical defrag. Myself, I like the fact that I never have to worry about running defrag. And though you might think I'm biased, it's the truth. :-) -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx. "Jeff" wrote in message ... Sorry Jill, Lotsa people don't like that decision though, Sorry bout the comment. Jeff "Jill Zoeller [MSFT]" wrote in message ... If you want a little background on the design decisions made for Vista's defrag, see our blog at https://blogs.technet.com/filecab/ar...r/default.aspx. You might find the FAQ useful, as well as the recent chat transcript. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx. "James" wrote in message ... Hello people, any one know the reason why microsoft had dumbed down DEFRAG ?? |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
Jill,
A quote from the chat; if I may; "Good question. As far as the user experience changes are concerned, the decision to simplify the user interface came as a result of usability research that we did accross various types of users (advanced to novice). " This is one where your research is wrong. Lots of people want the UI. Jeff "Jeff" wrote in message ... Sorry Jill, Lotsa people don't like that decision though, Sorry bout the comment. Jeff "Jill Zoeller [MSFT]" wrote in message ... If you want a little background on the design decisions made for Vista's defrag, see our blog at https://blogs.technet.com/filecab/ar...r/default.aspx. You might find the FAQ useful, as well as the recent chat transcript. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx. "James" wrote in message ... Hello people, any one know the reason why microsoft had dumbed down DEFRAG ?? |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
Jill,
Sorry bout the last post;I posted it before your response. But; still stand on the issue. LOTS of people do want the UI. Personally I use command line if I feel I want to override auto defrag;but then again;people like to see pretty colors. Jeff "Jeff" wrote in message ... Jill, A quote from the chat; if I may; "Good question. As far as the user experience changes are concerned, the decision to simplify the user interface came as a result of usability research that we did accross various types of users (advanced to novice). " This is one where your research is wrong. Lots of people want the UI. Jeff "Jeff" wrote in message ... Sorry Jill, Lotsa people don't like that decision though, Sorry bout the comment. Jeff "Jill Zoeller [MSFT]" wrote in message ... If you want a little background on the design decisions made for Vista's defrag, see our blog at https://blogs.technet.com/filecab/ar...r/default.aspx. You might find the FAQ useful, as well as the recent chat transcript. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Want to learn more about Windows Server file and storage technologies? Visit our team blog at http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/default.aspx. "James" wrote in message ... Hello people, any one know the reason why microsoft had dumbed down DEFRAG ?? |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
I was just about to ask about this till I found the post. An option to show
the graphical rep. of the drive would be nice tho. I think that for the business and IT users the one in XP was more professional looking. I am gonna go read that faq\blog that was posted tho before I say anymore. |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
Hello, thank for the link ;-) i understand why now...
i have just tested the command line who is great ;-) cya ;-) ----------------------------------------------------------------- If you want a little background on the design decisions made for Vista's defrag, see our blog at https://blogs.technet.com/filecab/ar...r/default.aspx. You might find the FAQ useful, as well as the recent chat transcript. |
|
|||
Why a dumbed down version of defrag ?
Jeff wrote:
Jill, Sorry bout the last post;I posted it before your response. But; still stand on the issue. LOTS of people do want the UI. Personally I use command line if I feel I want to override auto defrag;but then again;people like to see pretty colors. I think some kind of progress bar / percentage counter would be very important, but as for the pretty colours, if you want to see a pretty picture on your screen that has little to no relation with what is actually happening while your computer is defragging, why not just watch a DVD? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|