Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
The travails of installing a printer.
Don't read if you don't like stories. After all the discussion in the other thread, I figured I'd start to try to install the printer, the Brother MFC6800. Because I couldnt' get it close to the computer, I dug out my new Active Extension, USB2.0 Repeater Cable, but then wondered, if it has an amplifier built-in, is it bi-directional? I read the packaging but it said nothing. I looked at some of the text that went with ads for them, and the first said, Works with any USB device, but didnt' list scanners. Later I found text that also said it worked with any USB devide and listed printers and scanners, but didn't list printer/scanners. Finally I googled the cable name and "bidirectional" and got only one hit, not in the description but in a question someone asked on Amazon I think it was, where he was finally told that was NOT bi-d. Another guy commented, "I wish I'd known this before I snaked it through my walls and attic." It's sort of amazing how hard they made it to find this out. So I figured I'd buy a longer USB A/B cable, and I googled and several places had 16' for only 6 or 7 dollars, but they all wanted 3 to 5 days. Except Staples, which had one in stock at each of 3 nearby stores. Interstingly, Microcenter, which has a store fairly nearby, which has been quite cheap on several things wanted iirc $26 for their cheapest 16 foot, and almost that much for 5 foot!! I guess like a lot of places, they're cheap on some things and way high on others. 7) But then I thought, I should make sure the printer uses a USB-B port, so for some reason I looked in the manual and not on the printer. Well, apparently, it only works with USB if you have a Macintosh, not a PC!!! At least there are no instructions for the PC like it has fof Macinstosh. Have you ever heard of this before??? And even for that it says the cable can't be more than 6 feet long. In that case I have no place to put the printer, unless I use a parallel cable, except that the Dell Vostro 220 has no parallel port. Now somewhere I have parallel port card, a recent one, but I still don't remember what interface it has, nor do I know what empty slots I have on this computer. Plus I'm supposed to be getting out of Vista/2Gigs and moving to XP/4Gigs or 7/4Gigs, so it would be a waste to fix up this computer. But wait! I planned for this and bought a print server a while back. Let me go get it. Well, it's software stops at XP also. Good thing I only paid $7 for it, and nothing for the printer. LOL I will fix up an XP computer with a parallel port and use it that way. Who knows, she said it worked but it may be broken! |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
Micky wrote:
The travails of installing a printer. Don't read if you don't like stories. After all the discussion in the other thread, I figured I'd start to try to install the printer, the Brother MFC6800. I dug out my new Active Extension, USB2.0 Repeater Cable, but then wondered, if it has an amplifier built-in, is it bi-directional? Of course it is. This is an "active repeater" cable. End-that-plugs-to-computer ---- 5 meters of cable ---- one-port-USB-hub --x The 5 meters of cable has D+ and D- wires, and a protocol is in place to control what happens on the wires. Just like it is for any other host-peripheral thing on USB. The "One Port Hub" regenerates the data and acts as if you have bought a 4 port hub and blocked three of the ports with epoxy. There is a limit to how many active repeater cables you can string in series. There is an "end to end delay limit" for USB. On newer computers, you can use four cables, on older computers the limit is five cables. The difference, is newer Intel chipsets use hub technology within the Southbridge, which "eats up" one of the cables in your limit. I own three cables, and have successfully run a webcam on the end of three cables, without resorting to providing additional power at the business end of the cable. ******* The next item, is how do you make a Parallel Port. 1) On the SuperI/O chip. Supports all four modes. Unidirectional and bidirectional modes. Fully functional. Capable of running that JTAG converter cable you bought. 2) As a PCI card, with PCI to Parallel Port. Functions same as (1), with occasional issues on bus addresses and so on. They even make PCI Express x1 chips for this. 3) USB to parallel port. Now, this is the less-functional solution. Microsoft class standards parallel port driver only support one of four modes. So the parallel port is not fully functional. It is a "printer parallel port", not a "four function parallel port". Due to the missing protocol support, only one of the modes of operation is supported. This is an example of some of the operating modes of a real parallel port. Something in this list corresponds to SPP. http://retired.beyondlogic.org/spp/parallel.htm 1. Compatibility Mode. 2. Nibble Mode. (Protocol not Described in this Document) 3. Byte Mode. (Protocol not Described in this Document) 4. EPP Mode (Enhanced Parallel Port). 5. ECP Mode (Extended Capabilities Mode). So one of those modes, is used exclusively by a USB to parallel port dongle. If you want a fully functional parallel port, try this. I have one of these in the machine I'm typing this on. Shop around for best price. I got this for $30 or $35 at the time I bought it. PEX1PLP http://www.startech.com/Cards-Adapte...PP-ECP~PEX1PLP Paul |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
On 01/09/2016 08:49 AM, Micky wrote:
The travails of installing a printer. Don't read if you don't like stories. After all the discussion in the other thread, I figured I'd start to try to install the printer, the Brother MFC6800. Because I couldnt' get it close to the computer, I dug out my new Active Extension, USB2.0 Repeater Cable, but then wondered, if it has an amplifier built-in, is it bi-directional? I read the packaging but it said nothing. I looked at some of the text that went with ads for them, and the first said, Works with any USB device, but didnt' list scanners. Later I found text that also said it worked with any USB devide and listed printers and scanners, but didn't list printer/scanners. Finally I googled the cable name and "bidirectional" and got only one hit, not in the description but in a question someone asked on Amazon I think it was, where he was finally told that was NOT bi-d. Another guy commented, "I wish I'd known this before I snaked it through my walls and attic." It's sort of amazing how hard they made it to find this out. So I figured I'd buy a longer USB A/B cable, and I googled and several places had 16' for only 6 or 7 dollars, but they all wanted 3 to 5 days. Except Staples, which had one in stock at each of 3 nearby stores. Interstingly, Microcenter, which has a store fairly nearby, which has been quite cheap on several things wanted iirc $26 for their cheapest 16 foot, and almost that much for 5 foot!! I guess like a lot of places, they're cheap on some things and way high on others. 7) But then I thought, I should make sure the printer uses a USB-B port, so for some reason I looked in the manual and not on the printer. Well, apparently, it only works with USB if you have a Macintosh, not a PC!!! At least there are no instructions for the PC like it has fof Macinstosh. Have you ever heard of this before??? And even for that it says the cable can't be more than 6 feet long. In that case I have no place to put the printer, unless I use a parallel cable, except that the Dell Vostro 220 has no parallel port. Now somewhere I have parallel port card, a recent one, but I still don't remember what interface it has, nor do I know what empty slots I have on this computer. Plus I'm supposed to be getting out of Vista/2Gigs and moving to XP/4Gigs or 7/4Gigs, so it would be a waste to fix up this computer. But wait! I planned for this and bought a print server a while back. Let me go get it. Well, it's software stops at XP also. Good thing I only paid $7 for it, and nothing for the printer. LOL I will fix up an XP computer with a parallel port and use it that way. Who knows, she said it worked but it may be broken! The quick start PDF I looked at seemed to have directions for hooking up to USB. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...4ktO4yWhzjh1aA But the manual did not have PC setup (or I missed it). Did you just try and plug it in right next to your PC and see what happens? USB is so, oh so standard. I did notice the CD does not seem to have drivers over ME/2000 OS. So I'd think just plug it in. I'd take a stab with it 2 feet from the PC before thinking of any long extension cords etc. |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
Micky wrote:
Brother MFC6800. Because I couldnt' get it close to the computer, That discontinued printer/scanner/fax was released and marketed for Win95-XP and Mac 8.5-10 with not all functions available to all those OS. Its connectivity is by USB or parallel port, but it was parallel only for W95 and USB only for the Macs, and wouldn't scan for the Mac 10. Since the driver availability isn't 'clear' for the potential OS Vista, my initial testing would not be 'distant', but instead I would temporarily position the printer/computer adjacent to each other, even if that weren't my longer range objective, to satisfy the question of whether I had ANY driver problems . Since the other thread indicated that the target machine was a Vista OS Vostro 220 with USB but not parallel, then the trial hookup would be normal range USB. Adjacent, I would see if I had all functions; if necessary, I might choose to try to use the XP-provided software for something. Likely the Vista MS ware will recognize the printer. -- Mike Easter |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:14:31 -0500, Big Al wrote:
On 01/09/2016 08:49 AM, Micky wrote: The travails of installing a printer. Don't read if you don't like stories. After all the discussion in the other thread, I figured I'd start to try to install the printer, the Brother MFC6800. Because I couldnt' get it close to the computer, I dug out my new Active Extension, USB2.0 Repeater Cable, but then wondered, if it has an amplifier built-in, is it bi-directional? I read the packaging but it said nothing. I looked at some of the text that went with ads for them, and the first said, Works with any USB device, but didnt' list scanners. Later I found text that also said it worked with any USB devide and listed printers and scanners, but didn't list printer/scanners. Finally I googled the cable name and "bidirectional" and got only one hit, not in the description but in a question someone asked on Amazon I think it was, where he was finally told that was NOT bi-d. Another guy commented, "I wish I'd known this before I snaked it through my walls and attic." It's sort of amazing how hard they made it to find this out. So I figured I'd buy a longer USB A/B cable, and I googled and several places had 16' for only 6 or 7 dollars, but they all wanted 3 to 5 days. Except Staples, which had one in stock at each of 3 nearby stores. Interstingly, Microcenter, which has a store fairly nearby, which has been quite cheap on several things wanted iirc $26 for their cheapest 16 foot, and almost that much for 5 foot!! I guess like a lot of places, they're cheap on some things and way high on others. 7) But then I thought, I should make sure the printer uses a USB-B port, so for some reason I looked in the manual and not on the printer. Well, apparently, it only works with USB if you have a Macintosh, not a PC!!! At least there are no instructions for the PC like it has fof Macinstosh. Have you ever heard of this before??? And even for that it says the cable can't be more than 6 feet long. In that case I have no place to put the printer, unless I use a parallel cable, except that the Dell Vostro 220 has no parallel port. Now somewhere I have parallel port card, a recent one, but I still don't remember what interface it has, nor do I know what empty slots I have on this computer. Plus I'm supposed to be getting out of Vista/2Gigs and moving to XP/4Gigs or 7/4Gigs, so it would be a waste to fix up this computer. But wait! I planned for this and bought a print server a while back. Let me go get it. Well, it's software stops at XP also. Good thing I only paid $7 for it, and nothing for the printer. LOL I will fix up an XP computer with a parallel port and use it that way. Who knows, she said it worked but it may be broken! The quick start PDF I looked at seemed to have directions for hooking up to USB. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...4ktO4yWhzjh1aA It certainly does. Thank you very much. But the manual did not have PC setup (or I missed it). Now think it didn't have the PC setup. Strange. Did you just try and plug it in right next to your PC and see what happens? USB is so, oh so standard. I was going to go to Staples to get the cable but decided not too. Okay I went to staples. They have a different price for online/pickup at store and but-at-store. I was up all night again and now I need a nap. :-) I did notice the CD does not seem to have drivers over ME/2000 OS. So I'd think just plug it in. I'd take a stab with it 2 feet from the PC before thinking of any long extension cords etc. I'm always an optimist so I'll compromise with you. There's no place to put it within 2 feet so I'll buy the longer cable and if it doesn't work, I'll look for the the shorter one, or I'll use the amplified cable which should work for the printer in one direction and the scanner in the other. Good enough for testing. |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:36:13 -0500, Paul wrote:
Micky wrote: The travails of installing a printer. Don't read if you don't like stories. After all the discussion in the other thread, I figured I'd start to try to install the printer, the Brother MFC6800. I dug out my new Active Extension, USB2.0 Repeater Cable, but then wondered, if it has an amplifier built-in, is it bi-directional? Of course it is. Any chance you're thinking of USB3 active cables. I've found a couple descriptions of them being bidirectional. http://www.vision-systems.com/articl...nectivity.html "Bidirectional interfaces For bidirectional interfaces, such as USB and Apple's latest Thunderbolt interface, equalizers are typically found on both sides of the cable. To extend the reach of USB cables using equalization techniques, Icron Technologies and Intersil have jointly developed a USB 3.0 cable that delivers 5 Gbits/s of throughput over 20 m (see Fig. 2)." I only have one bulge on my cables, at one end. Monoprice might have sold those with two, or usb3, but if so, they were more expensive and at the time nothing I read talked about bidirectionality and the question didnt' occur to me. And none of the uses I bought the cables for, webcam, remote control keyboard and mouse, require bidirectionality. Only a printer that feeds back information about ink levels or malfunctions, or a printer/scanner. Micky PS. I came across still another website parroting Usenet. http://www.pcbanter.net/showthread.php?t=1094932 I noticed the thread name, which is the name of this thread. Someday I hope those readers learn how to access Usenet properly. They'll get more out of it. This is an "active repeater" cable. End-that-plugs-to-computer ---- 5 meters of cable ---- one-port-USB-hub --x The 5 meters of cable has D+ and D- wires, and a protocol is in place to control what happens on the wires. Just like it is for any other host-peripheral thing on USB. The "One Port Hub" regenerates the data and acts as if you have bought a 4 port hub and blocked three of the ports with epoxy. There is a limit to how many active repeater cables you can string in series. There is an "end to end delay limit" for USB. On newer computers, you can use four cables, on older computers the limit is five cables. The difference, is newer Intel chipsets use hub technology within the Southbridge, which "eats up" one of the cables in your limit. I own three cables, and have successfully run a webcam on the end of three cables, without resorting to providing additional power at the business end of the cable. ******* The next item, is how do you make a Parallel Port. 1) On the SuperI/O chip. Supports all four modes. Unidirectional and bidirectional modes. Fully functional. Capable of running that JTAG converter cable you bought. 2) As a PCI card, with PCI to Parallel Port. Functions same as (1), with occasional issues on bus addresses and so on. They even make PCI Express x1 chips for this. 3) USB to parallel port. Now, this is the less-functional solution. Microsoft class standards parallel port driver only support one of four modes. So the parallel port is not fully functional. It is a "printer parallel port", not a "four function parallel port". Due to the missing protocol support, only one of the modes of operation is supported. This is an example of some of the operating modes of a real parallel port. Something in this list corresponds to SPP. http://retired.beyondlogic.org/spp/parallel.htm 1. Compatibility Mode. 2. Nibble Mode. (Protocol not Described in this Document) 3. Byte Mode. (Protocol not Described in this Document) 4. EPP Mode (Enhanced Parallel Port). 5. ECP Mode (Extended Capabilities Mode). So one of those modes, is used exclusively by a USB to parallel port dongle. If you want a fully functional parallel port, try this. I have one of these in the machine I'm typing this on. Shop around for best price. I got this for $30 or $35 at the time I bought it. PEX1PLP http://www.startech.com/Cards-Adapte...PP-ECP~PEX1PLP Paul |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
Micky wrote:
Any chance you're thinking of USB3 active cables. I've found a couple descriptions of them being bidirectional. http://www.vision-systems.com/articl...nectivity.html "Bidirectional interfaces For bidirectional interfaces, such as USB and Apple's latest Thunderbolt interface, equalizers are typically found on both sides of the cable. To extend the reach of USB cables using equalization techniques, Icron Technologies and Intersil have jointly developed a USB 3.0 cable that delivers 5 Gbits/s of throughput over 20 m (see Fig. 2)." I only have one bulge on my cables, at one end. Monoprice might have sold those with two, or usb3, but if so, they were more expensive and at the time nothing I read talked about bidirectionality and the question didnt' occur to me. And none of the uses I bought the cables for, webcam, remote control keyboard and mouse, require bidirectionality. Only a printer that feeds back information about ink levels or malfunctions, or a printer/scanner. Micky PS. I came across still another website parroting Usenet. http://www.pcbanter.net/showthread.php?t=1094932 I noticed the thread name, which is the name of this thread. Someday I hope those readers learn how to access Usenet properly. They'll get more out of it. Actually, when I wrote my reply, I was thinking of my three USB2 active repeater cables. USB3 protocol is similar to SATA or PCI Express. It uses TX+, TX- for differential transmission. It uses RX+, RX- for differential reception. It supports full duplex (unlike USB2). On a USB3 connector, there are nine pins. Four pins are legacy USB2. Five pins are USB3. TX+, TX-, Ground, RX+, RX- Out of laziness, only one set of pins is used at any one time (auto-negotiated). OK, so what can you do with those ? The reach is limited with no equalizer. I don't even know right off hand, what the recommended passive cable length is for USB3. You can use automatic line buildout to try to compensate for cable length. There are limits as to how far you can go, before you run out of signal budget. Compare SATA and SAS for a moment. Both are differential, both are serial, and use a minimum of signal wires. The same TX+, TX-, RX+, RX- for the full duplex signals. However, SAS uses a more sophisticated line treatment, to extend the reach and support both short and extra long cables. This requires a good deal of skill on the part of the (microwave) designer hired to make that chip interface work. I think SAS only has a couple of settings for expected line length, so they didn't go overboard on the equalizer. Could they do it on USB3 ? Sure. Is the behavior at both ends of an augmented line specified in a standard ? That would help. Maybe something more fancy was done for USB3.1, and that is trickling down to make augmented USB3 devices ? Dunno. Sooner or later, as the rates go up, an equalizer might be required to make this crap work. There are all manner of abominations on the market, supporting non-standard lengths. But I don't promote them, because there is no way to know if they're "a good deal or not". Should I send every user out to spend $100 on an item like that, only to discover it has a measurable line error rate ? That probably wouldn't make me very popular. So when I shop for something for you, I tend to select any item which uses the "standards approved" length. If I can figure out what that is. ******* When I started out in electronics, my co-workers were already doing equalizers for some of the hardware we were building. That's when I first heard about them. I've never had to build anything nasty like that myself. That takes skillz. Paul |
|
|||
The travails of installing a printer.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:41:13 -0500, Paul wrote:
Micky wrote: Any chance you're thinking of USB3 active cables. I've found a couple descriptions of them being bidirectional. http://www.vision-systems.com/articl...nectivity.html "Bidirectional interfaces For bidirectional interfaces, such as USB and Apple's latest Thunderbolt interface, equalizers are typically found on both sides of the cable. To extend the reach of USB cables using equalization techniques, Icron Technologies and Intersil have jointly developed a USB 3.0 cable that delivers 5 Gbits/s of throughput over 20 m (see Fig. 2)." I only have one bulge on my cables, at one end. Monoprice might have sold those with two, or usb3, but if so, they were more expensive and at the time nothing I read talked about bidirectionality and the question didnt' occur to me. And none of the uses I bought the cables for, webcam, remote control keyboard and mouse, require bidirectionality. Only a printer that feeds back information about ink levels or malfunctions, or a printer/scanner. Micky PS. I came across still another website parroting Usenet. http://www.pcbanter.net/showthread.php?t=1094932 I noticed the thread name, which is the name of this thread. Someday I hope those readers learn how to access Usenet properly. They'll get more out of it. Actually, when I wrote my reply, I was thinking of my three USB2 active repeater cables. I was hoping to post again before you did, to contradict (or at least weaken, he said, having a hard time admitting he was wrong) what I said. Since I last posted, I replaced my new 16' A/B usb cable with a 10' cable I'd forgotten I had. (If I'd remembered, I wouldnt' have to go shopping yesterday.) And it didnt' print any better. I also found a 7' A/B cable I'd forgotten I had, but it's not long enough to connect without moving the printer. So I went to the active usb cable (that I'd never used before) and it didn't work any better! But, and this is a big but, then I went to the printer and scanned something. And that did show up in the computer, even though it means going the other direction. So only my pride keeps me from saying that you're right. But why don't they make this clear on the packaging? Didn't the question occur to them? How many amplifiers work in both directions? No other that I know of. And what about the guy on Amazon who asked and the other one who regretted snaking the cable through his walls and ceiling. (Well, he should have tested it before he did that. He might have had a bad cable.) Anyhow, scanning "worked" but the image was totally black, just like I get when I copy something with this, but not when I print an internal report. I have to take it apart and jiggle the connector at the scanner, and I suppose at the other end of the scanner cable to if I can find it. So that's one problem. And it doesn't print. Problem two. Not looking good. Maybe I should just buy a cheap wireless black and white laser printer and use the inkject all in one for scanning and faxing. It works fine. USB3 protocol is similar to SATA or PCI Express. It uses TX+, TX- for differential transmission. It uses RX+, RX- for differential reception. It supports full duplex (unlike USB2). What!! Now you're saying USB2 doesn't support full duplex? You mean both directions at the same time. Oh, that's okay. Continued: On a USB3 connector, there are nine pins. Four pins are legacy USB2. Five pins are USB3. TX+, TX-, Ground, RX+, RX- Out of laziness, only one set of pins is used at any one time (auto-negotiated). OK, so what can you do with those ? The reach is limited with no equalizer. I don't even know right off hand, what the recommended passive cable length is for USB3. You can use automatic line buildout to try to compensate for cable length. There are limits as to how far you can go, before you run out of signal budget. Compare SATA and SAS for a moment. Both are differential, both are serial, and use a minimum of signal wires. The same TX+, TX-, RX+, RX- for the full duplex signals. However, SAS uses a more sophisticated line treatment, to extend the reach and support both short and extra long cables. This requires a good deal of skill on the part of the (microwave) designer hired to make that chip interface work. I think SAS only has a couple of settings for expected line length, so they didn't go overboard on the equalizer. Could they do it on USB3 ? Sure. Is the behavior at both ends of an augmented line specified in a standard ? That would help. Maybe something more fancy was done for USB3.1, and that is trickling down to make augmented USB3 devices ? Dunno. Sooner or later, as the rates go up, an equalizer might be required to make this crap work. There are all manner of abominations on the market, supporting non-standard lengths. But I don't promote them, because there is no way to know if they're "a good deal or not". Should I send every user out to spend $100 on an item like that, only to discover it has a measurable line error rate ? That probably wouldn't make me very popular. So when I shop for something for you, I tend to select any item which uses the "standards approved" length. If I can figure out what that is. ******* When I started out in electronics, my co-workers were already doing equalizers for some of the hardware we were building. That's when I first heard about them. I've never had to build anything nasty like that myself. That takes skillz. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|