|
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
August 31st 06, 06:03 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
|
|||
|
|||
RAM and Performance
Vista is memory hungry and resource intensive.
It sure is. I have 1g, show usage from 40-50% What's the recommendation for PageFile size? The default, 1321, is lower than it would have been XP. Used to be 1.5-3X 
|
|
September 1st 06, 03:18 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
|
|||
|
|||
|
RAM and Performance
It only looks that way but all the it's "memory hungry resouce intensive"
crowd never test to prove it, they just look at the cpu/mem gadet or taskmanager. I tried with pre-RC1 and XP by loading as many programs/windows as I could... preRC1 went far, XP gasped at less then half of what I did in Vista by crashing on me. Vista mem/cpu management is far ahead of XP. "Bill Condie" wrote in message ... Vista is memory hungry and resource intensive. It sure is. I have 1g, show usage from 40-50% What's the recommendation for PageFile size? The default, 1321, is lower than it would have been XP. Used to be 1.5-3X
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
