Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Bye Bye Vista - Hello SUSE!
In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 29 May 2007 23:53:55 +0100, Steve Williams
wrote: On Monday 28 May 2007 23:31, Peter J Ross posted: In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 28 May 2007 23:14:09 +0100, Steve Williams wrote: On Monday 28 May 2007 21:11, Peter J Ross posted: In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 28 May 2007 19:45:34 +0100, Steve Williams wrote: I like the way Kate changes colour for HTML tags, Just like vim! and also helps point out obvious mistakes where you have opened { but not closed them. Just like vim! Very helpful editor, indeed. Just like vim! I thought vim was a console editor. http://supportweb.cs.bham.ac.uk/docs/tutorials/docsystem/build/tutorials/gvim/gvim.html "VIM can operate in a text based environment but there is a version known as gVim which operates in a GUI environment." I'm a KDE user (dont swear at me please) I'm a KDE user too, and gvim looks as good in KDE as the other GTK apps I use. I must be thinking of vi and that was a complete nightmare to use. I certainly prefer VI iMproved to VI or any other editor. I could never get on with it, so many keystrokes just to change a simple line of text. I used to hate editing things through the console, so I used to have to make sure I never broke my SMB server, and shared / as 'admin' like Windows shares C:\WINNT as 'ADMIN$' so that I could edit files. Aaaaaargh! (No other comment.) I find nano usable! nano suits me for console editing. I don't mind nano, but it's not what I'm used to and it doesn't have many kewl capabilities. It's one that I can actually use, so I'm quite fond of it (but prefer to edit under X of course. Copy and paste is very valuable to me! I mostly use X, so I just drag the mouse to copy, and middle-click to paste. I don't understand why M$ made copying and pasting so much more complicated. Of course, in vim I tend to use "y" and "p" a lot, because it's even easier. -- PJR :-) FNVWE : DHoT : HoT 2006-01 COOSN-266-06-40792 : 10GS : UHoL PSMHL&S 2003-12 & 2005-05 : 10GC&TR |
|
|||
Bye Bye Vista - Hello SUSE!
Lionel pinched out a steaming pile
: On 30 May 2007 15:05:33 GMT, §ñühw¤£f boggled at how lame the Kooks are these days, then wrote: PerfectReign pinched out a steaming pile : On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:48:33 +0000, §ñühw€£f wrote: PerfectReign pinched out a steaming pile : On Sun, 27 May 2007 15:20:24 +0000, §ñühw€£f wrote: JM pinched out a steaming pile off7qdnV- : On Sat, 26 May 2007 09:31:51 -0700, Feliks Dzerzhinsky wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 §ñühw¤£f wrote: The silence is deafening!!!!111!!!! Real men use vi... Only until they discover emacs. ;-) Only on days work is not required. ;p then they use nedit... *REAL* h4xx0rz use Kate. /me ducks Real real ha0rs write their own editor in assembly... Using Kate to write the editor? No7 3ven! Tehy hace to use a chip and a battery and code it to an eeprom!!!1111!!!! Pfft. Lamers. Editors for /real/ h4x0rs: MS-DOS/'Doze: copy con myfile.txt stuff ^Z Unix: cat myfile.txt DONE stuff DONE Assembler (generic): mov ix, 0 LOOP1: call GETKEY mov [_BUFFER + ix], al inc ix cmp ax, _EOFCHAR jnz LOOP1 Hey! I coppied that stuff into a dos box and it b0r|3d my puter... &Q5&Q6 actually slowed things down |