Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Vista Administration, Accounts and Passwords Queries, comments and issues relating to the administration of Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.administration_accounts_passwords) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
What would the effect be of taking ownership of a drive?
I have 3 drives: 20gb for the os, 160 gb for my documents, and a 250 for
video/music etc. After a clean install, all the files on the second and third drives have an Unknown owner, and I keep getting administrator prompts when i move/delete/etc. What would happen if I went into the properties of D: for example, and set the the owner to myself? (Instead of doing so for each folder on the drive) Will there be any ramifications in the disk management applet or anything? (I don't mind if the os gets toast - I am am testing after all, but I'd hate to mess up my data drives) I am on Vista RC1 |
|
|||
What would the effect be of taking ownership of a drive?
Hello,
Taking ownership of something in most cases is unecessary. The only things ownership entitles you to do is modify permissions on the thing you have ownership of. It does NOT give you access to the thing. For example, you can take ownership of a folder and still not have access to it. The only thing different about the situation after taking ownership of it is that you can change permissions on the thing to GIVE you permission to it - but this is an additional step. Now, there are some cases where folders have granted certain permissions explicitly to their OWNER - for example, a folder may say "grant my owner read/write access". In this case, if you are DUAL BOOTING and the owner of a folder happens to be your account on one of the other OS's, if you change the owner, then you may no longer have access to that folder from the original OS! In this case, changing the owner can have a very nasty side effects. The best solution is not to change ownership of any files; instead, simply add a permission via the security tab to give yourself access to the files. The propper place to add these permissions is on the FOLDERS that contain the files you need access to. You should never change permissions on a DRIVE if you have an operating system installed onto that drive. The only time you should change permisions on a drive is if it is used only for storing data, which may be your situation. Also, you should never change permissions on an operating-system folder, such as program files, windows, users, etc, or any file installed by the operating system - doing this can have signifigant side effects. (It is ok to change permissions of folders inside your user profile directory tho, such as documents and pictures). But, to specifically answer your question, changing the ownership of only the drive itself and not the files inside it should not affect anything. However, if you choose to propogate this ownership change to all the folders/files in the drive, and are dual booting (or have multiple users on a single OS), you may find you have difficulty accessing those files from other operating systems / users. These permissions do not affect disk management. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
What would the effect be of taking ownership of a drive?
Thanks Jimmy. That was a great answer. I have kept the same "One drive for the operating system, one or two for data" system for years, and never worried about ownership until Vista. The only reason I care is because of all the UAC prompts when deleting/moving files that I do not have the correct permission for. They are indeed simply data drives without any operating system files on them. I gave up dual booting its all or nothing with my personal machine. |
|
|||
What would the effect be of taking ownership of a drive?
snip
The only reason I care is because of all the UAC prompts when deleting/moving files that I do not have the correct permission for. They are indeed simply data drives without any operating system files on them. Sounds good ... you should be able to simply add a single permission to your data drive(s) that gives your specific username full control, and this should remove the UAC prompts. You should not have to tell Windows to "replace existing permissions" or any of those advanced options in this case - you should be able to use the normal, simple security tab interface to do this, with all of the default options. - JB |