Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Windows Vista File Management Issues or questions in relation to Vista's file management. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.file_management) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
The fact remains that a greater proportion of people "never" manually
defragged their hard drives because they couldn't be "bothered" or didn't know it should be done. So Microsoft went this way. At least the job gets done. Want a picture - buy a 3rd party tool! "Mark" wrote in message ... Why is it so hard to understand what this person wants. A lot of people want to see what is going on. Mark "Richard Urban" wrote in message ... Most people have better things to do with their time than sit and watch little boxes or bars being shifted around. The Vista defragmenter is a background service that does what must be done - when your computer is idle. It needs no interaction from you and is sufficient for the task. "Markus Eßmayr" essmayr/at/racon-linz.at wrote in message ... Hello to the defragmentation-tool-developer-team, please please add some progress information to the tool. Thanks very much! Max |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
Oh for gods sake. It their product. They can design it the way they want.
"Tom Lake" wrote in message ... "Richard Urban" wrote in message ... Most people have better things to do with their time than sit and watch little boxes or bars being shifted around. The Vista defragmenter is a background service that does what must be done - when your computer is idle. It needs no interaction from you and is sufficient for the task. How about Microsoft letting *US* decide what we want to see or not see? They could add an option to run in either GUI mode or in background mode. I don't like companies (or governments or other people for that matter) deciding what I should be allowed to see. Tom Lake -- Libertarian Forever! |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
In message "LesleyO "
wrote: I'm with you, Mark. Have been using Diskeeper for several years, now, on several units - it's efficient and reliable, and I love being able to customize when it does its thing and how often. I have it defragging my tower's drives and my USB drive as well, in the wee small hours when I'm asleep. So with your love of being able to customize, you configure it to do exactly what Vista's built in defrag already does by default? Oh, and in case you didn't notice, you can reschedule Vista's defrag tool as well, should you be so inclined. |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
So with your love of being able to customize, you configure it to do
exactly what Vista's built in defrag already does by default? And that is? Do you know 100% that the MS version of Defrag works better than a 3rd. party app? If someone wants to set and watch defrag work the that's their business. I personally use PerfectDisk2008 and is superior to the MS version. I ran the MS version first then ran PerfectDisk2008 and was very surprised how much more PerfectDisk2008 found that needed more defragging. Yes I'm very aware they all do things differently, but IMO the MS version lacks a lot. http://www.raxco.com/products/downloadit/ Try before you buy. -- All the best, SG Is your computer system ready for Vista? https://winqual.microsoft.com/hcl/ "DevilsPGD" wrote in message ... In message "LesleyO " wrote: I'm with you, Mark. Have been using Diskeeper for several years, now, on several units - it's efficient and reliable, and I love being able to customize when it does its thing and how often. I have it defragging my tower's drives and my USB drive as well, in the wee small hours when I'm asleep. So with your love of being able to customize, you configure it to do exactly what Vista's built in defrag already does by default? Oh, and in case you didn't notice, you can reschedule Vista's defrag tool as well, should you be so inclined. |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
In message "SG"
wrote: Do you know 100% that the MS version of Defrag works better than a 3rd. party app? No. Do you know 100% that other versions work better, and if so, does it save enough time to justify it's cost? If someone wants to set and watch defrag work the that's their business. I personally use PerfectDisk2008 and is superior to the MS version. I ran the MS version first then ran PerfectDisk2008 and was very surprised how much more PerfectDisk2008 found that needed more defragging. Yes I'm very aware they all do things differently, but IMO the MS version lacks a lot. The "do things differently" can be important, there are several different concepts that get lumped into "defragmentation" (or more rightly, optimization) Different tools can be built on different optimization theories and algorithms with regards to optimization, and will report other tools' optimized results as being less then optimal. No one method or algorithm is ideal for all users, all usage patterns, all of the time. This doesn't mean that it's impossible or even difficult to compare tools or results, but rather, that you cannot look at what one tool's analysis reports to evaluate another defragmentation tool. |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
"f/fgeorge" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:25:00 -0600, DevilsPGD wrote: In message "SG" wrote: Do you know 100% that the MS version of Defrag works better than a 3rd. party app? No. Do you know 100% that other versions work better, and if so, does it save enough time to justify it's cost? If someone wants to set and watch defrag work the that's their business. I personally use PerfectDisk2008 and is superior to the MS version. I ran the MS version first then ran PerfectDisk2008 and was very surprised how much more PerfectDisk2008 found that needed more defragging. Yes I'm very aware they all do things differently, but IMO the MS version lacks a lot. The "do things differently" can be important, there are several different concepts that get lumped into "defragmentation" (or more rightly, optimization) Different tools can be built on different optimization theories and algorithms with regards to optimization, and will report other tools' optimized results as being less then optimal. No one method or algorithm is ideal for all users, all usage patterns, all of the time. This doesn't mean that it's impossible or even difficult to compare tools or results, but rather, that you cannot look at what one tool's analysis reports to evaluate another defragmentation tool. Try www.auslogic.com it has a VERY good defragmenter and it is free. It works on Win2k, XP and Vista, so should cover all your pc's. Significantly faster than Vistas built in one. Since the defragmenter in my Vista system runs in the background and I have never noticed it. Why would I want any thing faster? So the background can sit idle? |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
While you are at work I shall come and pick up your automobile, work on it
and never tell you what was done. I shall come to your home, fix things that I feel needed fixed my way, but you shall never know. I will do these things in the background, so don't worry you will never know. See Charles it's not that MS Defrag doesn't do an reasonable job, for many it does, but for many as myself it doesn't. I like more control of what goes on behind the scenes and I do not or better yet will not allow any Vendor, MS or whomever to run any Defrag program in the background and "trust" what they believe is best for everyone. I prefer PerfectDisk 2008 Professional It is certified by Microsoft, ensuring the highest standards of quality. As a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner and member of the Microsoft Developers Network, Raxco maintains a close partnership with MS to ensure ongoing quality and compatibility. If defragmenter in your Vista is doing what you want it to do and you are satisfied then by all means stick to it, not a thing wrong with that. As I said for me it's more control and better options as to why I made the change and I'm glad I did. -- All the best, SG Is your computer system ready for Vista? https://winqual.microsoft.com/hcl/ "Charles W Davis" wrote in message ... SNIPPED Since the defragmenter in my Vista system runs in the background and I have never noticed it. Why would I want any thing faster? So the background can sit idle? |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
Markus Eßmayr;686112 Wrote: Hello to the defragmentation-tool-developer-team, please please add some progress information to the tool. Thanks very much! Max I'd like to see the progress like I could see it in XP as well. Another minus point from me to Vista as there is NO NEED AT ALL to make the progress bar disappear. I wanna see how far the process has come and how much more there is to wait. I don't like to run things in the background at all. -- aaalp |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
There is no waiting. If you want to shut down your computer - go ahead and
do it. The defragmenting will continue when you next boot the computer. Again, unless a person is anal and gets turned on by watching little colors move around there is no reason to have a display - as long as the job gets done. But, some people like to watch grass grow and paint dry also! "aaalp" wrote in message ... Markus Eßmayr;686112 Wrote: Hello to the defragmentation-tool-developer-team, please please add some progress information to the tool. Thanks very much! Max I'd like to see the progress like I could see it in XP as well. Another minus point from me to Vista as there is NO NEED AT ALL to make the progress bar disappear. I wanna see how far the process has come and how much more there is to wait. I don't like to run things in the background at all. -- aaalp |
|
|||
[Defragmentation] Feature request!
Richard,
That's your opinion and you are for sure entitled to it, however, that's your view and myself and others disagree. It's not a matter of watching little colors move around nor do I think anyone gets turned on by it, that's a pretty silly comment. If YOU trust a program such as MS Defrag to run in the background never knowing how or even if it's doing an adequate job then by all means go for it, I don't. I ran MS Defrag for awhile until I tried a few 3rd party Defrag programs and the one I settled with was PerfectDisk 2008. You made the comment in another post "At least the job gets done" are you sure? and if it does to what degree does the job get done? nothing to see, so how does one know? If I want a program to run I'll be the one to decide what and when it runs, not MS. -- All the best, SG Is your computer system ready for Vista? https://winqual.microsoft.com/hcl/ "Richard Urban" wrote in message ... There is no waiting. If you want to shut down your computer - go ahead and do it. The defragmenting will continue when you next boot the computer. Again, unless a person is anal and gets turned on by watching little colors move around there is no reason to have a display - as long as the job gets done. But, some people like to watch grass grow and paint dry also! "aaalp" wrote in message ... Markus Eßmayr;686112 Wrote: Hello to the defragmentation-tool-developer-team, please please add some progress information to the tool. Thanks very much! Max I'd like to see the progress like I could see it in XP as well. Another minus point from me to Vista as there is NO NEED AT ALL to make the progress bar disappear. I wanna see how far the process has come and how much more there is to wait. I don't like to run things in the background at all. -- aaalp |