Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
XP vs Vista overheads
Hopefully not too stupid a question but how does Vista compare to XP
regarding performance overheads. I know Vista is more complex but I was wondering if it might not also have more efficient code thus negating some of the increased performance requirments? |
|
|||
XP vs Vista overheads
So far, after several weeks of testing RC1 I have found it slower than XP HE
in almost every aspect. Although I do have to admit that my XP HE did have some reg tweaks. Even my internet connection is slower. 174K on XP compared to 164 on Vista. That's even after disabling the IPv6 that my IP doesn't support. Page loads as well as graphics are considerably slower with IE7 in Vista compared to IE7 in XP, and that's with all the same reg tweaks. HP and Nvidia both do not want to support their customers in Vista, until such times as the RTM is out. So now it's back to ATI and to hell with Nvidia and as all of my components are HP, from my $1200 camera to my printer to my tower, it's time to give this garbage to someone else and purchase a new system from a manufacturer that sees the sense in following a new OS build and developing drivers for it. TTFN. -- There are three types of people in computing, those that can count and those that can't. |