Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
There's also a setting via the Registry to set Superfetch to cache only boot files. This helps avoid very slow boots while still getting the benefit of not using Superfetch to cache running processes. Also if you have your swapfile totally managed by Windows you may be wasting a lot of disk accesses just resizing the swap file. Experiment with setting the min and max the same(avoid resizing) or just turning it off. As long as you're not overloading memory with too many startup apps you can always reset the swap strategy back to the default if neither works for you. -- MilesAhead "How come we don't know the I.Q. of the guy who invented the test?" |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
Also if you have your swapfile totally managed by Windows you may be
wasting a lot of disk accesses just resizing the swap file. Experiment with setting the min and max the same(avoid resizing) or just turning it off. As long as you're not overloading memory with too many startup apps you can always reset the swap strategy back to the default if neither works for you. -- I would agree with setting the paging file to a fixed size, as long is it's at least twice the Vista recommended amount. However, everything I've ever read says never turn off virtual memory since applications often ask for much more memory then they use and Windows needs to map that memory somewhere. |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
Victek;875084 Wrote: Also if you have your swapfile totally managed by Windows you may be wasting a lot of disk accesses just resizing the swap file. Experiment with setting the min and max the same(avoid resizing) or just turning it off. As long as you're not overloading memory with too many startup apps you can always reset the swap strategy back to the default if neither works for you. -- I would agree with setting the paging file to a fixed size, as long is it's at least twice the Vista recommended amount. However, everything I've ever read says never turn off virtual memory since applications often ask for much more memory then they use and Windows needs to map that memory somewhere. Instead of going by what you read, try trying something yourself. -- MilesAhead "How come we don't know the I.Q. of the guy who invented the test?" |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
Change your nick to "MilesBehind", you CLOWN.
If the swap file is turned off, problems WILL occur. "Out of memory" error comes to mind. You are a FOOL! -- Mad Mike MilesAhead wrote: Victek;875084 Wrote: However, everything I've ever read says never turn off virtual memory since applications often ask for much more memory then they use and Windows needs to map that memory somewhere. Instead of going by what you read, try trying something yourself. |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
That is just a dirty, mongrel DOG that is spoofing me here.
It's too gutless to post in its own name! -- Mad Mike "MilesAhead" wrote: Victek;875084 Wrote: Also if you have your swapfile totally managed by Windows you may be wasting a lot of disk accesses just resizing the swap file. Experiment with setting the min and max the same(avoid resizing) or just turning it off. As long as you're not overloading memory with too many startup apps you can always reset the swap strategy back to the default if neither works for you. -- I would agree with setting the paging file to a fixed size, as long is it's at least twice the Vista recommended amount. However, everything I've ever read says never turn off virtual memory since applications often ask for much more memory then they use and Windows needs to map that memory somewhere. Instead of going by what you read, try trying something yourself. -- MilesAhead "How come we don't know the I.Q. of the guy who invented the test?" |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
And you are a SPOOFER, besides being an abusive FOOL.
You little GERM. -- Mad Mike "Mick Murphy" wrote: Change your nick to "MilesBehind", you CLOWN. If the swap file is turned off, problems WILL occur. "Out of memory" error comes to mind. You are a FOOL! -- Mad Mike MilesAhead wrote: Victek;875084 Wrote: However, everything I've ever read says never turn off virtual memory since applications often ask for much more memory then they use and Windows needs to map that memory somewhere. Instead of going by what you read, try trying something yourself. |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
I'll try a few of these ideas tonight, thanks for the tips. I stopped getting notifications last night on this topic, and was surprised to see all these new ones. I do have my swap set to system managed so I will be trying to change that first and maybe limiting super fetch might not be a bad idea. -- ZeonStar |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
In 32-bit windows, After Effects is designed to use a maximum of 3GB of
memory, total. On 64-bit windows, After Effects is designed to use 3.5GB per processor! This could easily put you into page file territory and diminish processing speeds if you don't have enough memory installed. Next, CS3 is a 32-bit application. That means it must be emulated to work in a 64-bit environment. This doesn't mean much for most applications, but memory intensive programs will have a higher amount of overhead. When you ran CS3 on the 32-bit machine, processes were limited to 2GB (Actual use about 1.6GB.) On the 64-bit machine, things change! Images immediately increase to a 3GB limit. (Think undo history...) Because of this, it is recommended you have 6-8GB for CS3 on 64-bit machines. Most of these limits can be adjusted within CS3 back to something that doesn't fill up all your available memory or cause pagefile operations, but if you have the money, install more memory. You'll be a lot happier. "ZeonStar" wrote in message ... Hey all, Hope I am posting this in the right section and hope I can get some feedback. I'm not even sure if this is a windows problem, but it is a good place to start. See my system info for my system specs but the main point of this post is regarding my RAM. This system is the first time I've had 4 GBs of ram, and also the first time I'm using a 64-bit OS. My problem relates to the programs of the Adobe CS3 (That's CS3 and not CS4). I've been doing alot of editing in Premiere Pro, which itself isn't the problem. MY project in PPro is fairly complex, but only about 20 minutes long and nothing out of the oridinary. The problem begins when I open up any other app to do some related work, like After Effects, my RAM fills up very quickly and I can't understand why. I look at my Sidebar RAM indicator and it shows I'm using nearly all 4 Gigs of my RAM and the system performance suffers. Why is this? Often After Effects will have basically a small clip open, nothing compared to what Premiere has open but just those 2 apps will be nearly maxing out my RAM, where as PPro alone maybe takes up 2 to 2.3GBs or so. By contrast when I was on XP 32bit with 2 Gigs of RAM, on the same system I might add, I could have those 2 programs open, plus something like Maya, an IE instance, and so on and it wouldn't even phase the system. Do I have something set wrong? -- ZeonStar |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
Thank you Mark, that really helps me understand alot more than is going on. I thought maybe this whole thing was "Just me" but clearly there is more going on behind the scenes. I use Premiere more than After Effects, but I imagine your desciption is the same for either. It's interesting when I load a CS3 app is usually says like "2% of 4.0 GB of memory used" and my first thought is "Yeah right." How can I adjust CS3 like you mentioned at the end of your post? I can get some more RAM in a few weeks but in the meantime would like to tweak things the best I can. If I had 6-8 Gigs of RAM would CS4 be better about managing it? I'd hate to have just Premiere loaded and all of a sudden my 8 GBs of RAM is full. Also if I do get more RAM, which it then be best to have Superfetch left normal? -- ZeonStar |
|
|||
Memory filling up too fast?
This is a good starting point:
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/view...nalId=kb401089 http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Afte...132AB4723.html "ZeonStar" wrote in message ... Thank you Mark, that really helps me understand alot more than is going on. I thought maybe this whole thing was "Just me" but clearly there is more going on behind the scenes. I use Premiere more than After Effects, but I imagine your desciption is the same for either. It's interesting when I load a CS3 app is usually says like "2% of 4.0 GB of memory used" and my first thought is "Yeah right." How can I adjust CS3 like you mentioned at the end of your post? I can get some more RAM in a few weeks but in the meantime would like to tweak things the best I can. If I had 6-8 Gigs of RAM would CS4 be better about managing it? I'd hate to have just Premiere loaded and all of a sudden my 8 GBs of RAM is full. Also if I do get more RAM, which it then be best to have Superfetch left normal? -- ZeonStar |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|